In MBA programs, students learn about negotiation models that lean toward rational decision-making. The BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) model often has limited utility in complex emotional systems. The “Take It or Leave It” model ignores options and counteroffers. “Threats and Warnings” are power-based tactics that need to be identified and defused. For decades, I have used the ZOPA model with emotional family systems, and I believe that there are lessons for advisors that can be learned from the experiences of diplomats and crisis negotiators who often use this approach.1 I hope that this short article, designed for practitioners who need to accelerate change or reduce emotional conflicts, will be useful.
Figure 1: The ZOPA Model:
Work with each involved family member’s list of non-negotiables, the column on the left. These are what each member of your client family MUST hold true in the future. These are the easiest items to list because they reflect each family member’s core values. Examples may include career clarity, ownership, or asset management. Edit this column as you consider new items. If the item is important and negotiable, then you will add it to the ZOPA column.
Next, work with each family member to list the possible non-negotiables for the other family members engaged in the negotiations. These items are more difficult to list because family members will have to make educated guesses. Examples may include specific assets, sunk costs in an investment, and needing validation. Just like when playing poker, the participants are trying to guess what cards the other players have in their hands. Once again, if the item is not a firm non-negotiable for the other party, then add it to the ZOPA column.
Finally, list the ZOPAs. Number them for reference and discussion with clients. Examples may include: 1) working together as family enterprise owners; 2) dividing assets for/among specific owners; 3) distributing assets to the next generation; 4) amending the shareholder agreement’s buy/sell provisions regarding the transfer of assets within the family; 5) distributing some assets outside the family ownership; 6) defining phases of asset transfer; and 7) gifting ownership from the current generation to the next generation. Try to list at least twenty ZOPAs when possible.
Work with each involved family member’s list of non-negotiables, the column on the left. These are what each member of your client family MUST hold true in the future. These are the easiest items to list because they reflect each family member’s core values. Examples may include career clarity, ownership, or asset management. Edit this column as you consider new items. If the item is important and negotiable, then you will add it to the ZOPA column.
Next, work with each family member to list the possible non-negotiables for the other family members engaged in the negotiations. These items are more difficult to list because family members will have to make educated guesses. Examples may include specific assets, sunk costs in an investment, and needing validation. Just like when playing poker, the participants are trying to guess what cards the other players have in their hands. Once again, if the item is not a firm non-negotiable for the other party, then add it to the ZOPA column.
Finally, list the ZOPAs. Number them for reference and discussion with clients. Examples may include: 1) working together as family enterprise owners; 2) dividing assets for/among specific owners; 3) distributing assets to the next generation; 4) amending the shareholder agreement’s buy/sell provisions regarding the transfer of assets within the family; 5) distributing some assets outside the family ownership; 6) defining phases of asset transfer; and 7) gifting ownership from the current generation to the next generation. Try to list at least twenty ZOPAs when possible.
Sidebar
by Doug Gray
This week’s contributor, Doug Gray, writes about the VIA Classification assessment tools, which can help family enterprise practitioners think differently about their clients’ family system. He provides background information, an overview of the assessment, and provides the reader with several additional resources.
Below are some additional tips for family enterprise practitioners when using the ZOPA model:
Privacy. Each client should write his or her individual ZOPAs in private and review them with the advisor in one-to-one sessions. Clients can keep those notes in a back pocket or a password-protected file on their phone for confidentiality.
Access. When useful, encourage each client to retrieve his or her own ZOPA notes at any time. Clients should edit them frequently to keep them up to date. The ZOPA notes can be used as talking points to accelerate discussions. As in poker, an “ace in your hand” only has value when you place your card on the table. If the notes are on the client’s phone, then your client can discreetly retrieve the notes during any discussion.
Listen. When facilitating, listen actively for insights into the other party’s non-negotiables. Look for behavioral clues (e.g., emotional outburst, volume increases, standing up). Ask open-ended questions such as, “I’m a little confused. Are you saying that you want to retain total ownership or split ownership of the property at 131 Church St.?”
Below are some additional tips for family enterprise practitioners when using the ZOPA model:
Privacy. Each client should write his or her individual ZOPAs in private and review them with the advisor in one-to-one sessions. Clients can keep those notes in a back pocket or a password-protected file on their phone for confidentiality.
Access. When useful, encourage each client to retrieve his or her own ZOPA notes at any time. Clients should edit them frequently to keep them up to date. The ZOPA notes can be used as talking points to accelerate discussions. As in poker, an “ace in your hand” only has value when you place your card on the table. If the notes are on the client’s phone, then your client can discreetly retrieve the notes during any discussion.
Listen. When facilitating, listen actively for insights into the other party’s non-negotiables. Look for behavioral clues (e.g., emotional outburst, volume increases, standing up). Ask open-ended questions such as, “I’m a little confused. Are you saying that you want to retain total ownership or split ownership of the property at 131 Church St.?”
Structure. With complex emotional enterprises, I prefer direct face-to-face meetings because I believe that they are usually more effective than virtual meetings. However, both direct and virtual meetings work well when using the ZOPA model, and virtual meetings can include more participants in multiple locations.
Process. When facilitating, write the ZOPAs together as they emerge on a shared public list. Use a whiteboard, flip chart, digital notes, or chat features. Use words like “Options,” “Possibilities,” or “Ideas” in the title to encourage broad possibilities. These ZOPAs can help to define agendas for future meetings. Survey each client’s interests at the end of each meeting to determine which ZOPAs to focus on in the next meeting. At a certain point during the consulting process, the family’s most essential issues often become clear. At that point, the facilitator can focus on particularly relevant ZOPAs, which will in turn define the next phase of the consulting engagement. Distribute the updated ZOPA notes at the end of each meeting for consistency and to ensure mutual understanding among the participants.”
Validation. Openly expressed validation of the other party’s cogent points can accelerate the ZOPA process. One of the best motivators of pro-social human behavior is validation, and people especially crave it during times of conflict. If possible, it can be helpful for clients to say something like, “I’m thankful to my brother, Joseph, for his leadership in our valuation meetings. I’m willing to support Joseph with a dedicated resource team of ten subject matter experts in marketing, finance, operations, and legal. And I’m looking forward to meeting monthly until we execute this deal.”
Structure. With complex emotional enterprises, I prefer direct face-to-face meetings because I believe that they are usually more effective than virtual meetings. However, both direct and virtual meetings work well when using the ZOPA model, and virtual meetings can include more participants in multiple locations.
Process. When facilitating, write the ZOPAs together as they emerge on a shared public list. Use a whiteboard, flip chart, digital notes, or chat features. Use words like “Options,” “Possibilities,” or “Ideas” in the title to encourage broad possibilities. These ZOPAs can help to define agendas for future meetings. Survey each client’s interests at the end of each meeting to determine which ZOPAs to focus on in the next meeting. At a certain point during the consulting process, the family’s most essential issues often become clear. At that point, the facilitator can focus on particularly relevant ZOPAs, which will in turn define the next phase of the consulting engagement. Distribute the updated ZOPA notes at the end of each meeting for consistency and to ensure mutual understanding among the participants.”
Validation. Openly expressed validation of the other party’s cogent points can accelerate the ZOPA process. One of the best motivators of pro-social human behavior is validation, and people especially crave it during times of conflict. If possible, it can be helpful for clients to say something like, “I’m thankful to my brother, Joseph, for his leadership in our valuation meetings. I’m willing to support Joseph with a dedicated resource team of ten subject matter experts in marketing, finance, operations, and legal. And I’m looking forward to meeting monthly until we execute this deal.”
Notes:
- See related examples in Voss, C., & Raz, T. (2016). Never Split the Difference: Negotiating as if your life depended on it. Harper: New York.
- Merino, M. (2017, September 14). Understanding ZOPA: The zone of possible agreement. HBS Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/understanding-zopa
Resources
Sage-Hayward, W. (2017, March 8). Solving the Puzzle of Ownership Alignment in a Family Enterprise. The Family Business Consulting Group. https://www.thefbcg.com/resource/solving-the-puzzle-of-ownership-alignment-in-a-family-enterprise/
Nager, R. (n.d.). Parting Ways-Part 3: The value equations. The Family Business Consulting Group. https://www.thefbcg.com/resource/parting-ways-part-3-the-value-equations/
The Family Business Consulting Group. (n.d.). R-E-S-P-E-C-T. https://www.thefbcg.com/resource/r-e-s-p-e-c-t/